St. James R.C. Church

Seaford, New York

 
Pastor's Blog
February 8....Ash Wednesday's a coming...

My mind goes back to a conversation thirty years ago in the dining room of the rectory of Saint Dominic’s parish in Oyster Bay, my first assignment as a newly ordained priest. I was two years a priest and it was the dinner hour on Ash Wednesday that year.

I was tired, fussed, and edgy with giving Ashes that day on several occasions in two schools and even on the side-walk to importunate people who came out of the announced schedule. I gave vent to my frustrations and snide observations concerning “A and P Catholics.”

Around that table were three other priests: my pastor at that time, a fellow curate, and an elderly retired priest who was helping us for the day. Of them all (to quote the Book of Job) “I only am left to tell thee”; the three of them all since having passed away into God’s Mercy.

When I had finished venting, the elderly priest said simply “There will come a day when we will miss them and all this…”

I said nothing but in my prideful youth I dismissed his remarks and even hoped that day would come soon.

 

Thirty years on that “day” has come and I am not happy about it.

 

Even in a parish of this size, the “demand” on Ash Wednesday is not as great as it was in my earlier and smaller-sized assignments.

Part of it is the general decline in all the indices of Catholic practice; but I wonder if some of it might have been the attitudes towards “A’s and P’s” that too many of us clergy and “elite” might have communicated?

“Liturgical correctness” insisting that Ashes can “only be distributed at Liturgies” and a condescending bowl of Ashes left on a table in the aisle at other times with a dismissive “help yourself” note on it, etc.  Smirks, sighs, wise cracks even upon the faces and lips of clergy and parishioners, etc.  all can have added to it. 

It has taken me years as a priest to overcome my own aversion to the importunate, at times unreasonable and even unpleasant aspects of this day. It has been a growth in pastoral compassion and generosity that has been a work of Gods’ grace in my soul that is by no means fully accomplished. And no doubt the “A’s and P’s” bear the main responsibility for that condition, yet I want to place as few obstacles as possible to any “bruised reed or smoldering wick”.

In this Parish I decided some years ago that since we are still blessed with five clergy of still reasonable health and vigor we would all “bite the bullet” and not only give Ashes at the Liturgies but also  throughout the day and evening until 9 PM.

Yes, it is a bit of a “grind” and at near age 59 I find my energy and my legs are not what they used to be; and there is no guarantee that we will be able to offer this service indefinitely into the future; but for the time being we will continue.

 

I am under no illusion that there have been many “reverts” to the Faith because of this; but I do think that a number have been in some way impressed by the fact that they can come in to our church on Ash Wednesday and find a priest or deacon standing there to impose Ashes on them in a reverent manner in the name of the Church at their convenience and not just ours. I think of the many children and the elderly; the police men and women trooping in at their shift change to humbly receive Ashes; the nurses from Mid-Island, the passersby, and many others.

 

And what of us, you and me, my friend?

Our heart now needs to hear the stark reminder that accompanies the giving of Ashes drawn from the Book of Genesis: Remember, o man, that you are dust and unto dust you shall return.

All my fussing and edginess, dust.

Pride, laziness, pleasure-seeking ultimately dust.

 

Prayer….fasting…almsgiving….these are our weapons and our lifelines.

Prayer is what it says. Even that oft-derided “just saying prayers” is better than no prayer at all. Have I fallen out of the habit of daily prayer? If I am able, could I not attend daily Mass and more frequently practice the Sacrament of Penance?

Fasting is not only observing the mandatory fast and abstinence on Ash Wednesday and Good Friday, and no meat on the Fridays of Lent ( thought that is better than nothing); but also putting aside some little physical or emotional indulgence that while not sinful perhaps makes us weak and cowardly in sacrifice or generosity ?

Almsgiving is a way of sharing material resources for the needy and poor. The Catholic Ministries Appeal would be a very good focus this Lent for that.

 

So, here we go…another Ash Wednesday.

Pray for us that we do our work well and that somehow we share Christ and see Christ even in the most unknown and unlikely soul.

 

 

 

 

 
February 6 ....The one acceptable prejudice...

It has been observed by many in both the ecclesiastical and secular world that American society is dynamic and ever-shifting in its attitudes to what is called "political correctness" . There is today a very strong "PC police" mentality about what is, it is not acceptable, from the most obvious "hate speech" to what many people still regard as an acceptable observations of religious or social convictions.

However there is one enduring and, indeed, "acceptable" prejudice.

Years ago the liberal economist and social commentator ( and non-Catholic)John Kenneth Galbraith observed that the single most enduring prejudice in America was, in his opinion, anti-Catholicism.  Anti-Catholicism has also been termed " the anti-Semitism of the intellectuals". Any remark even remotely seeming to express mere disapproval of aspects of African- American, Jewish, or Gay culture is met with a withering blast of hysterical condemnation from all the "right thinking" elements of society. Even when the poor ex-Miss California ventured a respectfully phrased belief that marriage should be between a man and a woman, she was destroyed by a concerted campaign of hatred, scorn and ridicule as if she were the Grand Dragoness of the Ku Klux Klan.

Recently President Obama appointed a Mr. Harry Knox to the White House office of Faith-based and Neighborhood Partnerships. Mr. Knox is also a gay-activist ( I wonder what would happen to someone who described himself as a "hetersosexual activist"?) and has said and reiterated that Pope Benedict XVI is "hurting people in the name of Jesus" by ( you guessed it) opposing the use of condoms to contain AIDS in Africa and elswhere. You can find a good discussion of this ( and possible action) on http://stmichaelsociety.com/

Now, it is, as they say, "a free country"; and it's not so much that Mr. Knox is what he is, and says what he says; but the fact that he can do it from a Presidentially appointed position that bothers me.

Could you imagine if, let's say, Mr. Knox was a self-described "Catholic Activist"  who asserted that "Islam is hurting people in the name of Allah" by not strongly and universally condemning terrorism committed by Muslims?  Or asserting that "the current group of secular Jews running Hollywood studios is undoing the good work done by their predecessors like Goldwyn and Mayer" ?

You know the answer as you read this.

Not only would such a man not be appointed to any post at all; but would be hounded out of public life.

But Mr. Knox can....

The single most perduring prejudice in American society is anti-Catholicism.

 
February 2....Candlemas

Does that word "Candlemas" ring a bell?

It does for me.

I grew up in a parish that still retained some of the old German tone that it had at its founding in the 19th century.

Of all the immigrant groups that expanded  and filled our churches, seminaries, and convents starting about a hundred years ago, the Germans had the most "liturgical" tradition. The Irish never had the chance to practice their Faith 'above ground' for centuries; and Italian Catholicism featured more popular 'festas' of Saints and Our Lady. In my home parish we still had outdoor Corpus Christi processions and candles were blessed on this day. The Dominican Sisters who taught us at the parochial school (themselves a German congregation originally ) taught us the traditional English name for the "Purification of Our Lady": Candlemas. The pre-Reformation English language noted in this term the ancient custom of the blessing of candles on this day and named "the Candle Mass" shortened to "Candlemas".

 

 
January 15th..."Are their any Catholics in the house?..."

The recent events in Haiti have been, and will continue to be, a horror to all of us.

We will be asking you to contribute in the second collection this weekend to the Bishops' earthquake relief  efforts.

One would not know it from some media outlets; but the vast majority of Haitians are Roman Catholics. The Church in that country has been devastated by the death of the Archbishop of Port au Prince, and presumably many other clergy, religious, and laity. Our own Diocesan Mission in Santo Domingo (that shares the island of Hispaniola) is preparing to minister to an expected flood of refugees over the border from Haiti into the Dominican Republic.

Just today I saw a quote on Fox News from a physician who said that the "only institution" that was doing any good in Haiti was the Catholic Church. No other news outlet that I have seen have even mentioned the Church with regard to Haiti. There have been some references to "Christian missionaries" (i.e., evangelical Protestants) and a piece on local TV about a Haitian Anglican church ( an unusual combination of an English Church and a French/African people) in Brooklyn.

I must say I have been struck by the absence of Catholic spokesmen on the media these past four days. The Archdiocese of New York, the Dioceses of Brooklyn and Rockville Centre all have significant Haitian populations.

I refer you to the  Diocesan website for information about aid to Haiti.

www.drvc.org

 
January 11th..."The Signs of the Times..."

About twenty years ago I was told by a parishioner of a neighboring parish that his pastor had given a sermon at Mass in which he said he no longer felt responsible for those in the parish who never or rarely attend Mass. That pastor went on to say that he “only cared about those who went to Mass and supported the parish.”

That parishioner asked me if I thought that was the right thing for him to say.

Twenty years ago, long before I became a pastor, I thought the answer was easy.

Now I’m not as sure.

Some years ago it occurred to me that saying that Saint James was “a parish of five thousand families” was simply not true. The “five thousand families” was merely the total number of entries in the latest parish census.

The truth is, the actual number of people who I see at Mass, or even dealt with on an occasional basis, is far less.

The “real” parish as opposed to the “official” parish is maybe 20% of the total number “on the books.”

What about the other 80%?

The Lord faced the same phenomenon. In the cure of the ten lepers, only 10% even acknowledged their own cure or thanked Him for His gift of healing. Jesus’ question “Where are the other nine?” is very real today to any pastor. Every parish in our part of the world is essentially in the same situation and the trend is in fact downwards.

This is despite decades of conscious attempts to make Liturgies, Religious Education, parish programs and pastoral outreach “relevant to the needs of the people.”

A parish might have a particularly popular priest or program for a while; but the lasting effects almost always are the same: little or nothing. So often that popularity was purely personal, and even at the price of authentic Catholicism.

The churches were full after 9/11; but within months things got “back to normal.”

One can go on and on in this vein.

To go back to that pastor twenty years ago and what I think of what he said: I do not think that I should not care about that 80%. They are all “my” and our fellow parishioners. We at times intersect with them at certain moments; e.g. Baptisms, First Sacraments, Confirmation, Weddings, and Funerals. At those times we try to be Christ to them; despite our human weaknesses. We owe it to them to put nothing merely humanly blame-worthy between them and the Lord.

However, I will say this: I am more and more convinced that unless a person is part of the worshipping community he or she simply does not “get” it. Such a person will not “get” what it means to be a Catholic; much less the life of the parish. We try to open the door for such people at those special moments I noted above: but THEY need to walk through that door.

We perhaps have forgotten the fact that Our Lord never promised that His Church would be “successful” in the statistical sense. I was born in 1951, as was this parish. We grew up in the age of what someone called “Mega-Church”. A world in which the rate of practice among Catholics in the US approached 80% in many places.

A world in which seminaries and novitiates actually turned away prospective candidates for the priesthood and religious life because they had too many applicants and standards were high. A world in which parochial schools had enrollments of half a thousand and new parishes were established year by year.

There was something very “American” in all this: we make a cult of “success.”

Yet, Jesus so often spoke of rejection: of Him; and of His disciples.

Perhaps we thought we were exempt?

In one of the most astounding ironies of the Church’s history it was precisely when a monumental effort was made to “open the windows” to the world; that the flow began away from the Church.

That trend took dozens, then hundreds, then thousands of priests, brothers, nuns, and lay men and women out of the Eucharistic family and the Church herself.

We see the aftermath all around us.

We read so often in the Scriptures a challenging, and once understood, perhaps consoling message in so many passages:

“I will leave in your midst a remnant, a people humble and devoted.”

“ When the Son of Man comes, will he find faith on the earth, do you think?”

“ Do not fear, little flock, the Father has decided to give you a kingdom.”

“If they will not hear Me, they will not hear you.”

We are in a period where the flock seems small. That oft-heard cliché of the Sixties “read the signs of the times” means something rather different today.

The answer?

I’m not sure.

However I am convinced it will not be by futher secularization or "protestantization" of what remains of the Church's life and practice. We stand, in my opinion, of another Counter-Reformation. As in the 16th and 17th centuries the Catholic Church needed to purify, and courageously re-asserted herself in the face of the Protestant Reformers who denied many Catholic doctrines not by imitating them, but by firmly proclaiming the truth of which she is the guardian.

I will write more on this as the “Spirit” ( or the mood) takes me.

 

 

 

 

 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next > End >>
Page 1 of 8